On 19 November 2025, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) warned that the proposed New Common European System for Returns risks being shaped by politics rather than science. They stressed that migration policies must be grounded in robust evidence to protect human rights and ensure effective outcomes.
Research Should Guide Policy
Although the proposal cites Horizon Europe projects—FAiR, GAPS, MORE, and MirreM—MEPs noted it lacks a clear problem analysis and does not fully integrate research findings. MEP Tineke Strik highlighted that without evidence behind the draft Returns Regulation, policymakers cannot properly assess its impact.
Risks of Weak Safeguards
MEPs raised concerns that the proposal could:
-
Weaken protections for migrants, especially children
-
Disincentivize voluntary return
-
Contribute to the criminalisation of irregular migrants
MEP Murielle Laurent emphasized that detention conditions in some places are poor, making safeguards essential. MEP Fabienne Keller added that research shows voluntary returns are the most effective and sustainable, and detention should be minimized.
Evidence-Based Recommendations
The Horizon Europe projects offer concrete guidance:
-
GAPS: Prioritize voluntary returns, strengthen rights-based governance, and ensure monitoring.
-
FAiR: Involve third countries and non-state actors, and establish independent human rights oversight.
-
MORE: Eliminate migration detention, expand community-based support, and offer stable residence for those who cannot be returned.
The Message Is Clear
MEPs urged the EU to base return policies on evidence, not political rhetoric, to ensure returns are safe, fair, and effective. By aligning with research, the European Union can better protect rights and support sustainable solutions for migrants.
Read the full press release here
